5 Nov 2026, Thu

They promised 9 million ounces… they delivered 3 million

November 5, 2026

Bonus Content: Copper’s Inventory Signal Is Echoing Gold’s Message


A note from our friends at Golden Portfolio(ad)

In 2010, the second-biggest gold miner on earth, Barrick Gold, produced 7.77 million ounces…

In the same announcement, its CEO told shareholders the company was “positioned to increase production to 9 million ounces within five years.”

Well… This year, Barrick’s guidance is under 3.25 million ounces.

Whoops.

They never got anywhere near 9 million. In fact, they gave up more than half of what they already had.

If you want to know how to profit as gold majors like Barrick, Agnico and Newmont scramble to buy up productive junior miners, go here.

Barrick isn’t alone in this.

Newmont paid $15 billion for Newcrest in 2023, the largest deal in mining history…

In 2025, it was right back where it started.

Newmont produced 5.9 million ounces last year – the same figure it produced in 2020. In other words…

The largest gold major on earth paid $15 billion – and ended up with no additional ounces at all.

If you want to profit from the acquisition phase of a gold bull market – it isn’t difficult…

Every ounce a gold major pulls out of the ground makes the mine worth a little less.

A gold mine is a wasting asset – shrinking in slow motion… and exploration takes a decade or more to pay off.

That’s why gold majors do the only other thing available to them:

They buy the best small companies already mining gold… at whatever premium it takes.

Last August, I wrote: “The easiest way for gold miners to replenish their resource is to acquire smaller companies.” In other words…

I knew this wave of acquisitions was coming:

  • MAG Silver – up 56.6%
  • Reunion Gold – up 71.9%
  • Calibre Mining – up 107.7%
  • Probe Gold – up 166.7%
  • Rupert Resources – up 177.9%
  • Loncor Gold – up 181.8%
  • G2 Goldfields – up 1,228.6%

Gains like those are why Porter Stansberry recently called me:

“THE most knowledgeable gold investor in the world.”

Go here to see my top three buyout targets

Regards,

Garrett Goggin, CFA, CMT
Lead Analyst and Founder, Golden Portfolio

P.S. The acquisitions phase of this gold bull market has a long way to run. If you want details on my top three buyout targets today, go here.

 
 
 
Bonus Article

Copper’s Inventory Signal Is Echoing Gold’s Message

Copper is not simply a metal right now. It is a verdict on the dollar.

Cash copper settled at $14,110 a tonne on Tuesday, and LME copper stocks stood around 309,650 tonnes as of November 3. That inventory level matters more than the price headline alone. But it does not support the claim that London inventories have been falling for seven straight sessions to 229,650 tonnes. If anything, published LME stock totals were higher than late October.

The Stoxx Europe 600 and its sector moves, along with the single-day moves cited for ArcelorMittal, ASML, and Soitec, may be directionally plausible given post-election trading, but the specific percentages and company drivers in this paragraph are not verifiable as written. The broader point stands: investors have been reassessing the AI trade after the U.S. midterms, and that has helped cyclicals and materials.

The force underwriting that rotation is a weaker dollar. Reuters reported Wednesday, November 4, that gold climbed about 3% after Democrats swept the U.S. midterm elections, as the dollar slid and investors focused on the fiscal outlook. However, this draft’s specific claim that gold rose 2.6% to $4,035 is not supported by that report, and the move and level should be framed more generally. Silver also rose on Wednesday, but the draft’s claim that it climbed 9.69% to $53.31 by early Thursday is not supported by the same reporting. Copper, gold, and silver are not three different stories today. They are one story with three price tags.

In the long term, insufficient global capital expenditure on copper mines and declining grades at older mines can keep supply elasticity low, while emerging demand from power grids, energy storage, new-energy infrastructure, and data centers remains in an expansionary cycle. That structural squeeze does not care about election results. It was tightening before Wednesday night and will tighten after.

For investors, the question is where to position. Realized copper prices have climbed significantly, directly boosting revenue and operating cash flows for Freeport-McMoRan and BHP Group, two of the world’s largest copper mining companies. BHP reported $58.8 billion in revenue in fiscal 2026, up 15%. BHP has also said its copper business generated more than half of group EBITDA for the first time in FY2026.

Freeport achieved strong results in second-quarter 2026, with operating income from its U.S. copper mines more than doubling in the first six months of the year, primarily reflecting higher average realized copper and molybdenum prices.

Antofagasta and Southern Copper offer purer copper exposure for those who want leverage to price rather than diversification. Glencore adds trading revenue on top of production, which historically can amplify returns in volatile, high-spread environments like today’s Comex-LME spread.

This draft also cites a specific BMO view on refined copper tariffs and the Comex-LME spread, plus a “historical trading pattern” warning about a November 2026 correction. Those claims are not verifiable from public primary sources in the form presented here, so they should be treated as general risk framing rather than attributed specifics: a resolution on refined copper tariffs could allow U.S. inventories to normalize, pulling the price lower. And when prices push into record territory, the odds of a sharp correction tend to rise.

Both risks are real. But the inventory signal from London is not as clear-cut as “seven straight weeks of declining LME stocks.” What is clear is the macro backdrop: a post-election dollar slide and easing yields were supportive for precious metals this week, and copper has been trading like a macro asset as much as an industrial one. The question for precious metals investors is not whether to notice the connection. It is whether they are positioned for it.